Mine is. Or, at least it looks like it is. There is an old adage in business, "If a financial report is too long and too complicated, it could be that someone is trying to hide something." I don't know if anyone is hiding anything, but my royalty statements are very long, complicated, and difficult to understand. For example, below is an illustration of one type of entry where they subtracted $3,750 in royalties with no explanation, other than "adjustment." (Just imagine the CEO of a publishing company getting a pay check with a deduction of $3,750 with no explanation.) :
This happens over 10 times on the statement. There are so many entries like this that I don't know where to start asking questions. But I know something is wrong precisely because there is no explanation. They know where this entry comes from, but they are not sharing it with me. Why not?
I have always thought that mathematics was a colorful, exciting discipline to study, and I want this reflected in the materials we publish at XYZ Textbooks. Our new Algebra: A Combined Course 2/e is our best example yet. The cover art, and the opening art in each chapter, is from the artist Tracy Taylor. I have knows Tracy for years and I have always admired her beautiful, colorful paintings. So, I asked her if she would be willing to create some art for this book and, happily, she was very receptive to the idea. She came into the office and we explained the themes we were developing for each chapter of the book. She went back to her studio and created a painting for each chapter, specific to the theme in the chapter introduction. It was an amazing and enjoyable process, and I am extremely happy with the results.
We will be in San Diego at the AMATYC conference this month, so come by the booth and take a look at our new book, and Tracy's art. I know you will like what you see.
We had a family vacation planned with one of our children and three of our grandchildren. I had an idea that we could all read the same book and then discuss it while we were on vacation. So I texted my granddaughter Ava who is in 6th grade.
She responded with this
Eight of us went on a family vacation to Truckee, California: four adults and four children, and almost everyone read the book before we got there. The book was fantastic. I still think about the main character, Melody, and I hope she is doing well. I know it is fiction, but she must be based on someone,
I was surprised by how much fun this was, the level of the discussions, and of the compassion the children possessed. Part of the success of this was that we chose a book they were interested in, rather than one the adults liked. Here is a video with more of the experience:
Is your school dropping some of your developmental math courses? In California, the CSU system will eliminate all developmental math courses starting this Fall. But our students have not changed. So, while everyone tries to find a solution, we have some options for you: Our corequisite textbooks can be added on to any textbook you are using. Each corequisite book contains 20 lessons. You can cover them all at the beginning of your course, or you can cover specific lessons when you need them. Each textbook sells for $24 to the student. For more information go to www.xyztextbooks.com.
Each corequisite textbook is accompanied by a bootcamp course. Students can access the corresponding bootcamp course for free if they have an All-Access Pass to XYZ Textbooks, or for as little as $20, if they do not have an All-Access Pass. We have three courses running now. Three more will be released by the end of the year, including Bootcamp for Statistics. For more information go to www.xyztextbooks.com.
I can't help it. Every time I see loose-leaf, shrink-wrapped textbooks, I think of a student pulling out a handfull of pages from their backpack and watching it all blow away in different directions. Their textbook is blowin in the wind.
The publishers will tell you that student like these loose-leaf books because they only take what they want to class. It's not true; students don't need to take anything to class. In fact, they can photograph their textbook page on their cell phones and take that to class. We do not need to put up with loose-leaf books, we need lower prices.
A recent survey indicates that 92% of all college students prefer a print textbook to a digital one. And we know that this is especially true in college level, developmental mathematics. Those of us who teach developmental math know that some of our students do not have adequate internet access at home. The students in rural areas sometime have no internet access. The same is true for some of our low-income students. The advantage to a print textbook is that you can study anywhere. Probably the best solution right now is to have both a print book and an eBook.
If you ask the major publishers, they will tell you that students prefer buying an eBook over a print book, and that the difference is increasing every year. Of course that's true; the publishers are the ones the priced their print books out of reach of students. They created the problem and now they are telling us the eBook is the solution.
You should see what we have to offer at XYZ Textbooks before you roll into any new edition. If you are using a textbook that has been on the market for three or four years, there is a good chance your publisher is going to try to move you to the new edition as quickly as possible. They may even give you only a few months to make up your mind. (See the video that accompanies this post for an interesting example of this.) If you are locked into their online homework system, you may just roll into the new edition because it is convenient. Before you do that, you should take a little time and see what we have to offer. And we have some features and applications in our eBooks that no other publishers have. Plus we have the XYZ Promise: No revisions before 5 years, no price increases for the life of the edition. Even if you decide to stay with your current publisher, by taking a look at XYZ Textbooks, you will at least know what the alternatives are.
Remember when publishers were our partners in educating students? As an author—and as a teacher—I felt that way. But that seems like a long time ago at this point. Now we get high prices, faster revision cycles, unnecessary bundles, and forced rolls. Notice how all of these things solve the publishers’ own issues—not ours.
These business practices are industry-wide, and I think it is time to put a stop to this type of behavior. There’s only one way to communicate this in a way they will understand: Choose another book. While
I was talking with an instructor using one of our books and our online homework system. Without any prompting she said she has used MyMathLab and WebAssign and XYZ Homework and she actually preferred XYZ Homework over the other two. Her main reason for preferring us was that we answer the phone when she calls with a support question. With the other systems, she has to submit a request for support and someone gets back to her in 24 hours.
So, if you are tired of pressing 1 when you call your publisher. And you are tired of submitting support emails, call us - we answer our phones.
The 7th edition of my trigonometry book carried a list price of approximately $320. Trigonometry is one book that turned out just they way I envisioned it. When it was published, I was proud of it. In the first few editions of the book, the price was reasonable. But now, it is embarrassing. If I was starting my career again, I don't think I would write that book, knowing that the price would be more than most students could afford. And I'm wondering about the new, enthusiastic instructors, that would like to write their own trigonometry book. Would they want to go to all that trouble knowing that the price would be unreasonably high? Are the major publishers eliminating the next generation of textbook authors because of the high prices they put on their books?
All the posts you see here have been, or will be, posted on my LinkedIn account. If you want to see them as they are released, follow me on LinkedIn: